Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Two issues with Tree View

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Two issues with Tree View

    I'm in the process of migrating a tree containing over 10,000 people from Ancestry.com/FTM to Reunion. I love almost everything about Reunion. Not only does it solve all kinds of problems created by Ancestry, it solves problems I didn't even realize were problems.

    But inevitably there are a few things I wonder about. Apologies if these issues have been addressed before--I looked but couldn't find anything.

    First, in the pedigree version of Tree View, one Ancestry/FTM feature I _really_ miss are the rightward-pointing triangles at the right-hand ends of "branches", that indicate whether there are or aren't further ancestors up each branch of the pedigree. This really should be something visible at a glance, not something you have to click to see. Not having them makes pedigree view about 50% less useful.

    The second issue is a constant irritant. My database combines my ancestors and those of my wife. We decided to do it this way because beyond a certain number of generations we have a lot of the same ancestors, and it seemed like a lot of work to have to enter them all twice, into two separate databases.

    So: I know how to make my wife and me the "home" couple in Family View. But there doesn't seem to be any equivalent setting for making one or the other of us the default single root person in Tree View. Instead, it always defaults to me -- I can be working in Tree View ten generations up my wife's ancestry, but if I click the "home" button at the bottom of the screen, the Tree View pops back to me and my immediate forebears.

    To make her the root person instead is just one click on the downward-pointing triangle underneath "me". But when I have to do that one extra click several dozen times in an hour's work, it starts getting a little old. The fact is, my wife has a much more extensively documented ancestry than I do, so at any given time I'm much more likely to be looking at, or editing, people who are her forebears. So I'm going to want the tree "root" to be her most of the time. Is there some way to accomplish this that I've missed? Or, failing that, might this be considered a really, really heartfelt feature request?

    #2
    Re: Two issues with Tree View

    First off, I'd recommend you repost this in the Wish List forum. You have some good points and it seems almost like an oversight that there are no continuation arrows on the pedigree tree view.

    Originally posted by Patrick Nielsen Hayden View Post
    First, in the pedigree version of Tree View, one Ancestry/FTM feature I _really_ miss are the rightward-pointing triangles at the right-hand ends of "branches", that indicate whether there are or aren't further ancestors up each branch of the pedigree. This really should be something visible at a glance, not something you have to click to see. Not having them makes pedigree view about 50% less useful.
    The arrows are there in the hourglass orientation for the tree view. Have you considered working in this orientation as a workaround? the main drawback is that you're restricted to a maximum of 5 generations up instead of 8.

    Originally posted by Patrick Nielsen Hayden View Post
    So I'm going to want the tree "root" to be her most of the time. Is there some way to accomplish this that I've missed? Or, failing that, might this be considered a really, really heartfelt feature request?
    Again, as a workaround, clicking the home button in hourglass orientation returns you to the start couple instead of a single person, and this keeps your wife's family accessible. Another workaround in pedigree orientation is to ensure your wife's name is present and accessible in the sidebar, and click on her name there to return to her as the "root" in the family view.
    Tim Lundin
    Heartland Family Graphics
    http://www.familygraphics.com

    Comment

    Working...
    X